Fun with typesetting: "Banks" is the author's last name, not the title. |
"Use of Weapons" made it onto my reading list thanks to a series of mini-articles published by the New York Times debating what science fiction movie or novel seems most prescient today1. Brad DeLong's essay caught my attention:
Gene Roddenberry, the creator of "Star Trek," picked up that ball and ran with it to make a moral point about the limits of understanding and action, about how we should not mess with things that we don't understand. We, as Americans, have a bad history of following the Pottery Barn rule: We break things, and neglect to fix them or own them.Minor spoilers below.
In "Use of Weapons," Iain M. Banks seeks to make a different point. He loads the dice. His civilization, the Culture, and its special action executive arm, Special Circumstances, has the knowledge and foresight that America’s best and brightest did not. They use their weapons for the utilitarian good.
Nonetheless, they use their weapons and they use them up. And their weapons are people.